{"id":13355,"date":"2023-02-20T17:44:04","date_gmt":"2023-02-21T01:44:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/essential.construction\/news\/turkey-quake-revives-debate-over-nuclear-plant-being-built\/"},"modified":"2023-02-20T17:44:05","modified_gmt":"2023-02-21T01:44:05","slug":"turkey-quake-revives-debate-over-nuclear-plant-being-built","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/essential.construction\/news\/turkey-quake-revives-debate-over-nuclear-plant-being-built\/","title":{"rendered":"Turkey quake revives debate over nuclear plant being built"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"-\"<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n

\n

NICOSIA, CYPRUS \u2014 A devastating earthquake that toppled buildings across parts of Turkey and neighboring Syria has revived a longstanding debate locally and in neighboring Cyprus about a large nuclear power station being built on Turkey\u2019s southern Mediterranean coastline.<\/p>\n

The plant\u2019s site in Akkuyu, located some 338 kilometres to the west of the epicenter of the Feb. 6 quake, is being designed to endure powerful tremors and did not sustain any damage or experience powerful ground shaking from the 7.8 magnitude earthquake and aftershocks.<\/p>\n

But the size of the quake \u2013 the deadliest in Turkey\u2019s modern history \u2013 sharpened existing concerns about the facility being built on the edge of a major fault line.<\/p>\n

Rosatom, Russia\u2019s state-owned company in charge of the project, says the power station is designed to \u201cwithstand extreme external influences\u201d from a magnitude 9 earthquake. In nuclear power plant\u00a0construction, plants are designed to survive shaking that is more extreme than what\u2019s been previously recorded in the area they\u2019re sited.<\/p>\n

The possibility of a magnitude nine earthquake occurring in the vicinity of the Akkuyu reactor \u201cis approximately once every 10,000 years,\u201d Rosatom told The Associated Press via email last week. \u201cThat is exactly how the margin of safety concept is being implemented.\u201d<\/p>\n

An official with Turkey\u2019s Energy Ministry, when contacted by the AP, said there were no immediate plans to reassess the project. The official spoke on condition of anonymity in line with government protocol. Some activists, however, still say the project \u2013 the first nuclear power plant in Turkey \u2013 poses a threat.<\/p>\n

Nuclear facilities are constructed of heavily reinforced concrete, sized for significant earthquake shaking and far more robust than commercial buildings, said Andrew Whittaker, a professor of civil engineering at the University at Buffalo who is an expert in earthquake engineering and nuclear structures.<\/p>\n

The fact that it\u2019s sited off the western end of the East Anatolian Fault, which was linked to last week\u2019s powerful tremor, suggests that the design would have been checked for significant shaking, Whittaker added.<\/p>\n

Still, Whittaker said, it would be prudent to reassess seismic hazard calculations in the region for all infrastructure, including the plant.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s no reason to be concerned, but there\u2019s always a reason to be cautious,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s little comfort to activists in Turkey and on both sides of ethnically divided Cyprus. They\u2019ve renewed their calls for the project to be scrapped, saying that the devastating earthquake is clear proof of the great risk posed by a nuclear power plant near seismic fault lines.<\/p>\n

In a statement to the AP, the Cyprus Anti-Nuclear platform, a coalition of over 50 Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot environmentalist groups, trade unions and political parties, said it \u201ccalls on all political parties, scientific and environmental organizations and the civil society to join efforts and put pressure on the Turkish government to terminate its plans for the Akkuyu nuclear power plant.\u201d<\/p>\n

Cypriot European Parliament member Demetris Papadakis asked the European Commission what immediate actions it intends to take to halt the plant because of the dangers posed by building a nuclear power station in a seismic zone so close to Cyprus.<\/p>\n

Nuclear power plants worldwide are designed to withstand earthquakes and shut down safely in the event of major earth movement \u2013 about 20 per cent of nuclear reactors are operating in areas of significant seismic activity, according to the World Nuclear Association.<\/p>\n

For example, Japanese nuclear plants, including the Hamaoka Nuclear Power Plant, are in regions where earthquakes of up to magnitude 8.5 may be expected, the association said. Stricter safety standards were adopted after the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster, when a tsunami crashed into the Daichi plant, melting three reactors and releasing dangerous levels of radiation. And the Diablo Canyon Power Plant in California was designed to safely withstand earthquakes, tsunamis and flooding that could potentially occur in the region too, according to its operator.<\/p>\n

Turkish nuclear regulators provided the license for the plant\u2019s\u00a0construction\u00a0in Akkuyu in 1976 following eight years of seismic studies to determine the most suitable location, but the project was slowed down after the Chernobyl nuclear accident in 1986.\u00a0Construction\u00a0of the first reactor started in 2018. Large nuclear power plants have traditionally taken a while to build because of the size, scale and complexity of the infrastructure, and delays associated with first-of-a-kind plants.<\/p>\n

According to Rosatom, a study by Turkey\u2019s Office for the Prevention and Elimination of Consequences of Emergency Situations indicates that the site in Akkuyu \u2013 some 95 kilometers from Cyprus\u2019 northern coastline \u2013 is located in the fifth degree earthquake zone, which is considered the safest region in terms of earthquakes.<\/p>\n

The plant design includes an external reinforced concrete wall and internal protective shell made of \u201cprestressed concrete,\u201d with metal cables stretched inside the concrete shell to give additional solidity to the structure, the company said. And the modern reactor design, Russia\u2019s VVER-1200, includes an additional safety feature \u2013 a 144 ton steel cone called the \u201ccore catcher\u201d that in an emergency, traps and cools any molten radioactive materials, Rosatom added.<\/p>\n

The company emphasized that power units with VVER-1200 reactors comply with the post-Fukushima requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s a political dimension to qualms about the plant: Cyprus has accused Turkey of augmenting the Turkish Cypriots\u2019 dependence on it in order to entrench the island\u2019s ethnic division. Turkey has said it would supply the breakaway Turkish Cypriot north of the island with electricity through an undersea cable. A pipeline suspended a couple of hundred meters under the Mediterranean\u2019s surface is already supplying the north with water.<\/p>\n

The plant, whose first of four reactors is scheduled to go online later this year, will have a total capacity of 4,800 megawatts of electricity, providing about 10 per cent of Turkey\u2019s electricity needs. According to government figures, if the power plant started operating today, it could singlehandedly provide enough electricity for a city of about 15 million people, such as Istanbul, Rosatom added.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s estimated to cost $20 billion. Rosatom has a 99.2 per cent stake in the project, and is contracted to build, maintain, operate and decommission the plant.<\/p>\n

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n