{"id":20403,"date":"2023-08-05T19:36:35","date_gmt":"2023-08-06T02:36:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/essential.construction\/news\/midyear-23-jobs-outlook-construction-analytics\/"},"modified":"2023-08-05T19:36:36","modified_gmt":"2023-08-06T02:36:36","slug":"midyear-23-jobs-outlook-construction-analytics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/essential.construction\/news\/midyear-23-jobs-outlook-construction-analytics\/","title":{"rendered":"Midyear \u201923 Jobs Outlook \u00ab Construction Analytics"},"content":{"rendered":"

[ad_1]
\n<\/p>\n

\n

Construction JOBS continue to creep higher, even when volume is falling. From Apr\u201922 to Oct\u201922 jobs increased 1.5% but volume of work dropped 10%. Jobs and volume should track together as seen from 2011 to 2018. Since Oct\u201922, jobs are up only 2% while volume up 7%. Volume is catching up.<\/p>\n

\n
<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

Construction Jobs have been on an even rate of growth approx. 2.5% to 3% per year, even when volume is falling. Spending has been on a bumpy climb, but keeps climbing. Without inflation real volume of work overall since 2020 has not increased at the same rate as jobs. <\/p>\n

Current July Jobs are up 1.5% since Dec.\u201922, up 3% vs the average for 2022. July will be pretty close to the average for 2023. As construction inflation slowed down (has been slowing since mid-2022), volume gained ground on jobs over the last 9 mo., but jobs since Jan 2020 are still 10% higher than volume.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s a look at total jobs just since 2020<\/p>\n

\n
\"-\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

Why do jobs sometimes\/often grow faster than volume to support those jobs? Some possibilities:<\/p>\n

When inflation is unusually strong, business planners may misjudge growth. Planning jobs growth on inflated revenues that net much lower than expected volume may lead to misjudging jobs growth. Result is jobs growth faster then volume.<\/p>\n

When volume is decreasing, firms may be reluctant to (or smart not to) let go jobs. See the period on the above plot from Mar 2022 thru Oct 2022. Vol dropped 10%, Jobs increased 2%. So, the calculation shows a big excess in jobs for that period, because volume growth doesn\u2019t support it. Within the next six months, volume increased 7%, making up half the difference.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s jobs vs vol in each sector. <\/p>\n

Notice how Rsdn jobs barely declined in 2020, but Rsdn volume increased 10%. Did that set off cries of jobs shortage in Rsdn? Not so in Nonres.<\/p>\n

\n
\"-\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

In Nonres Bldgs, volume by 2021 had fallen below growth in construction jobs. The deficit reached its worst in 2022 but in the last 9 months volume growth far faster than jobs growth has evened the balance.<\/p>\n

\n
\"-\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

Nonbuilding construction volume fell to a deeper deficit than Nonres Bldgs. But we can see the gap closing as volume increases faster than jobs.<\/p>\n

\n
\"-\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

These above three sector plots go back to base 2019, showing how much percent change there has been since 2019. For a longer term look, here below is a plot of Nonresidential Buildings back to 2011. On this plot we can see jobs growth, when compared to 2011, for Nonres Bldgs, is above volume growth since 2017. The low point of volume was in 2021. 2022-2023 has posted the most rapid growth in many years. This closes the gap between Nonres jobs and volume, very helpful to the productivity outlook.<\/p>\n

\n
\"-\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

When splitting out jobs by sector we must always remember that some Nonres bldgs jobs actually work on constructing residential buildings (for ex., steel and concrete on a multifamily hirise) but remain counted as nonres jobs. Also, some undocumented workers may not be counted at all in residential jobs. That skews the data plots. But you can see that it would reduce the jobs in Nonres and increase the jobs in residential, improving both plots.<\/p>\n

Construction spending data is indicating a slight dip in volume growth over the 2nd half 2023, but then leading into much stronger growth in 2024 in all sectors. Volume by Feb\u201924 is back to today\u2019s level after falling 5%. I don\u2019t expect jobs to decline with the drop in volume. Maybe slow down. I think at worst jobs hold steady for a few months before resuming 2.5%-3% annual growth later this year.<\/p>\n

\n
\"-\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

When jobs continue to increase while volume is dropping, that wrecks productivity. But sometimes volume increases rapidly while jobs grow steady at a 3% rate. Look at the period Oct\u201922 thru Jan\u201923. Jobs increased 2%, but volume quickly jumped 6%.<\/p>\n

\n
\"-\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

The number of jobs required to put-in-place $1 billion of construction in one year, as plotted below, about 5000 for residential, is the inverse of the plot above, the annual amount of $ put-in-place per job, about $200,000 for residential.<\/p>\n

\n
\"-\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Like this:<\/h3>\n

Like<\/span><\/span> Loading…<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Related<\/em><\/h3>\n<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n