{"id":8996,"date":"2022-04-08T14:37:00","date_gmt":"2022-04-08T21:37:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/essential.construction\/news\/?p=8996"},"modified":"2022-04-08T14:37:00","modified_gmt":"2022-04-08T21:37:00","slug":"ny-contractors-pay-1-3m-to-settle-supplier-diversity-allegations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/essential.construction\/news\/ny-contractors-pay-1-3m-to-settle-supplier-diversity-allegations\/","title":{"rendered":"NY contractors pay $1.3M to settle supplier diversity allegations"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>Dive Brief:<\/h3>\n<p>The New York attorney general called out 10 construction companies for an alleged supplier diversity pass-through scheme and settled with one of the largest of them for $125,000 to conclude a yearslong investigation that netted $1.3 million in penalties. \u00a0<br \/>\nLetitia James, New York&#8217;s AG (above),\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ag.ny.gov\/press-release\/2022\/attorney-general-james-secures-125000-contractor-violating-diversity-requirements\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">announced the final settlement<\/a> with the Rochester, New York-based Pike Co., a top 400 contractor whose business was founded in 1873. The AG&#8217;s office alleged Pike skirted New York State diversity requirements in the contract for the $1.2 billion Rochester Schools Modernization Program.<br \/>\nIn a statement, Pike contested the AG&#8217;s allegations. &#8220;The Pike Company does not agree with the attorney general\u2019s findings regarding construction that was performed and completed over a decade ago,&#8221; the firm said in a statement emailed to Construction Dive. &#8220;Further our belief is that our actions fall squarely in the confines of what was required in the RSMP diversity plan.&#8221; The firm said it settled &#8220;solely to avoid costs and distractions associated with protracted litigation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The settlement is the latest in a string of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.constructiondive.com\/news\/massachusetts-construction-contracts-fall-short-for-women\/619974\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">high-profile cases<\/a> scrutinizing compliance with minority and women-owned business enterprise participation targets on construction projects. Last week, the U.S. District Attorney&#8217;s Office in St. Louis <a href=\"https:\/\/www.constructiondive.com\/news\/missouri-contractor-charged-with-fraud-for-minority-business-claims\/621638\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">indicted a contractor<\/a> in a separate alleged pass-through scheme. <\/p>\n<p>In the New York case, the Rochester schools project required good faith efforts for prime contractors to subcontract 15% of their work to minority-owned businesses, and another 5% to women-owned firms. But the AG alleged the 10 companies named in its release engaged in pass-throughs, where they used non-MWBE firms to perform work, but ran the money and paperwork through MWBE companies to give the appearance of compliance. <\/p>\n<p>For example, in the <a href=\"https:\/\/ag.ny.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/pike_aod_fully_executed.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">settlement<\/a>, the AG alleged Pike submitted paperwork to give the appearance that a MWBE firm, Scott Construction, provided $846,000 worth of doors, frames and other hardware on the schools project. <\/p>\n<p>But Pike actually got $754,786 of materials from Rochester Colonial, a non-MWBE firm, the AG alleged, via a purchase order that ran through Scott Construction.\u00a0Scott Construction didn&#8217;t immediately return a call seeking comment.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Including minority and women-owned businesses in public projects is meant to give opportunities to communities that have been historically left out, not for contractors to work around them,&#8221;\u00a0said James in a press release. &#8220;It&#8217;s a shame that the Pike Company and other contractors took the easy way out to minimize work with minority businesses.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Nine other New York-based firms were named in the New York AG&#8217;s release for allegedly violating the school project&#8217;s diversity requirements. Their names and the previous settlement amounts paid since 2016 are:<\/p>\n<p>Concord Electric Corp. ($350,000)<br \/>\nBell Mechanical ($200,000)<br \/>\nManning Squires Hennig ($200,000)<br \/>\nHewitt Young Electric LLC ($160,000)<br \/>\nLandry Mechanical Contractors ($117,000)<br \/>\nKaplan Schmidt Electric ($100,000)<br \/>\nMichael A. Ferrauilo Plumbing &amp; Heating ($90,000)<br \/>\nMark Cerrone\u00a0Inc. ($25,000)<br \/>\nNairy Mechanical LLC ($12,000)<\/p>\n<p>Construction Dive reached out to each of these firms; none immediately provided comment. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Paula L. Finch, an attorney at St. Louis-based Greensfelder, Hemker &amp; Gale, P.C. who focuses on supplier diversity in construction projects, said in an interview with Construction Dive that it&#8217;s not unusual for firms to overstate diverse supplier numbers to win bids. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If there&#8217;s one frustration that I&#8217;ve not been able to overcome in my career, it&#8217;s the folks that are willing to cross the lines from an ethical standpoint, because it better positions them to get the contract,&#8221; Finch said prior to the announcement of the New York settlement. &#8220;That&#8217;s why lawyers have jobs. That&#8217;s why the compliance people have jobs.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The alleged pass-through schemes took place between 2012 and 2014 during the first phase of the Rochester schools project, with a whistleblower \u2014 who will receive $25,000 of Pike&#8217;s settlement payment, according to the release \u2014\u00a0coming forward in 2013. Former New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman first pursued the case, with James&#8217;s office continuing it. <\/p>\n<p>Pike said the contracts highlighted by the AG&#8217;s office overlooked its other work for the schools. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;These are two contracts out of more than 100+ subcontracts and $220 million worth of construction completed many years ago,&#8221; Pike said in its statement. &#8220;The company highly values diversity and [emerging business enterprise] compliance and has spearheaded multiple EBE programs in addition to training and compliance efforts, which was a regular course of action for the Pike Company before this dispute.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The settlement also calls for Pike and the other contractors to undergo training, remediation and compliance reviews. The attorney general&#8217;s Civil Rights Bureau will actively monitor the contractors\u2019 adherence to these requirements.<\/p>\n<p>But while the release from the AG&#8217;s office highlighted the firms it settled with, it didn&#8217;t say whether any of the MWBE firms allegedly involved in the scheme faced repercussions as well. <\/p>\n<p>For example, a <a href=\"https:\/\/ag.ny.gov\/press-release\/2016\/ag-schneiderman-announces-825k-settlements-contractors-who-faked-compliance\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">2016 release<\/a> from former Attorney General Schneiderman&#8217;s office outlined how MBWEs received a fee for allowing checks and contracts to pass through their firms. <\/p>\n<p>A spokesperson for James couldn&#8217;t immediately say whether any MWBEs that served as pass-throughs faced repercussions for their roles in the scheme.<\/p>\n<p><em>Sebastian Obando contributed to this report.<\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"itemsource\">This item was originally posted here: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.constructiondive.com\/news\/ny-contractors-pay-13m-to-settle-supplier-diversity-allegations\/621792\/\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"feedzy-rss-link-icon\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dive Brief: The New York attorney general called out 10 construction companies for an alleged supplier diversity pass-through scheme and &#8230; <a title=\"NY contractors pay $1.3M to settle supplier diversity allegations\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/essential.construction\/news\/ny-contractors-pay-1-3m-to-settle-supplier-diversity-allegations\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about NY contractors pay $1.3M to settle supplier diversity allegations\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":8997,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1066,457],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8996","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-all-posts","category-construction-dive","generate-columns","tablet-grid-50","mobile-grid-100","grid-parent","grid-33"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/essential.construction\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8996","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/essential.construction\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/essential.construction\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/essential.construction\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8996"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/essential.construction\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8996\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/essential.construction\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8997"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/essential.construction\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8996"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/essential.construction\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8996"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/essential.construction\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8996"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}