Hi there,
We started our project about three years ago. Since then we’ve had two major delay events, one of which was owner related. Both delays were accepted by the client. Does it make sense to show the original baseline to the schedule or a revised baseline based on one of the major delay events?
Hello! It’s great to hear from you. In situations where there have been major delay events in a project, it can be beneficial to show both the original baseline schedule and a revised baseline that incorporates the impact of the delay events. This can provide a clear picture of how the project timeline has shifted and help in understanding the reasons behind the delays.
By showing both baselines, you can demonstrate the initial plan and how it has been adjusted due to the delay events. This can be helpful for tracking progress, assessing the impact of the delays, and communicating with stakeholders about the current status of the project.
Ultimately, the decision to show the original baseline, the revised baseline, or both will depend on the specific needs and requirements of your project and stakeholders. It’s important to consider the context of the delays and how best to represent the project timeline to ensure transparency and clarity in project management. Let me know if you have any other questions or need further assistance!