A Finnish experimentation project developed a framework for classifying ground conditions for building and infrastructure construction. It will help anticipate the future cost of foundation laying during the early stages of city planning.
The ground
 conditions of an area can have a substantial effect on the costs and the
 environmental impacts of constructing buildings and infrastructure. At early
 stage, urban designers don’t typically have enough data to make smart decisions
 about zoning in that respect as obtaining that data is time-consuming and hence
 also costly.
Consequently, an experimentation project called MAKU-digi: Making the costs of land use visible devised a method for automating the analysis of ground conditions. I had the pleasure of interviewing Juha Liukas, Lead Advisor at Sitowise, and Hilkka Kallio, Geologist at Geological Survey of Finland (GTK), about the project.
Brewing the Idea
“While we
 were developing the Citycad software back in the 1990s, we had this idea of
 combing a ground conditions map with a town plan for analyzing constructability,”
 says Liukas. “One of our clients was the city of Espoo, which had just mapped
 out the city’s ground conditions.”
However, turning
 this idea into a method and a practical tool did not materialize until much
 later. In early 2017, Sitowise, Geological Survey of Finland, and six other
 organizations started an experiment as part of the national KIRA-digi
 digitalization program. The project was called MAKU-digi.
Espoo had
 meticulously kept its ground conditions data up to date and was invited to take
 part in the project. Other large cities—Helsinki, Vantaa, and Tampere— soon followed
 suite, together with the Finnish Transport Agency. They provided the project with
 five pilot case studies.
The Sources of Ground
 Conditions Data
As ground
 conditions data is not readily available in every part of the country, cities use
 local geotechnical investigations to augment data from national sources. 
“At GTK, we
 carried out a 35-year mapping project of superficial deposits, which created
 geographic data as polygons,” says Kallio. “This gives an overview of soil
 across the country, 1-meter deep. I think, in the beginning, soil mapping was
 mainly meant to serve agriculture and forest planning. Today our soil maps are
 widely used by land use planners”
Ground-penetrating
 radars, satellite imagery, and drone surveys offer additional data that
 geological experts can use to estimate ground conditions. However, Kallio
 emphasizes that geophysics does not offer alone accurate enough information for
 construction purposes. She would rather rely on geotechnical investigations as
 primary data.

Automating Geotechnical
 Analysis
A two-by-two
 kilometer area can involve up to 10,000 individual geotechnical investigations.
 Analyzing that amount of data manually is impractical. Thus during the project,
 GTK devised and tested a system that automatically identifies certain beds and
 strata in the ground.
The other
 main output of MAKU-digi was a system for using geotechnical investigations,
 soil maps, and digital elevation models to classify any geographical location
 on a standardized scale. The “soil construction capacity class” of the
 location, combined with the location’s zoning elements, determines the
 foundation type. It, in turn, has a unit price that when multiplied with the
 building area gives an estimate of the foundation costs. The results can be
 presented visually on a map.
“In
 MAKU-digi, we dealt with the relative rather than absolute costs of foundation
 construction. There are other projects, like the national IHKU Alliance, that
 will provide a cost management system for infrastructure construction,” Liukas
 points out. “I envision a future where you can upload a draft detail plan to an
 online service and see the updated foundation costs at once, even as you make
 changes to the design.”


Harmonizing Urban Design
 Data
“The
 Ministry of the Environment saw our results and came to the conclusion that our
 harmonized classification model could become a JHS recommendation,” says
 Kallio. The so-called JHS recommendations provide national information
 management guidelines for both governmental and municipal administrations.
Another
 project called Municipality Pilot is formulating a process and information
 model for digital detail planning. It has tested combining a detail planning
 model with the MAKU-digi analysis in three municipalities.
“I don’t
 know of any examples from other countries where a ground condition method and classification
 is standardized at the national level. So in that sense, we are doing
 pioneering work here in Finland,” Kallio concludes.


